Analysis of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Modes and Effects

Jian Zhoua, Xiaohui Lua, Liang Yea, Yu Shaoa

Author information


aSchool of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, China

E-mail: zj00@tsinghua.org.cn (Jian Zhou, corresponding author)

Abstract


This study evaluates COVID-19 prevention and control policies. Based on the simulation, we compare the effects of two major policies: contact restriction and active treatment. Through regression and cluster analysis, we classified 169 countries and regions in the world into 10 groups, among which five groups accounted for the major proportion: the ones with the labels “CHN (China) mode,” “SE (South Europe) mode,” “ENE-SSA (East & North Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa) mode,” “US (United States) mode,” and “DEU (Germany) mode”). Differences in the effects of the prevention and control of COVID-19 in typical countries in each mode are comprehensively investigated. The conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: First, contact restriction outperforms active treatment in curbing the spread of COVID-19. Second, “CHN mode” ranks the highest level of epidemic control and emphasizes epidemic prevention and control more than economic stimulus, which is the opposite of the “US mode”. Regression analysis reveals that the differences in epidemics worldwide are caused by policy differences among modes.

Keywords


COVID-19, SEIR simulation, prevention and control policies, cluster analysis, rolling regression

Cite this article


Jian Zhou, Xiaohui Lu, Liang Ye, Yu ShaoAnalysis of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Modes and Effects. Front. Econ. China2021, 16(4): 628–665 https://doi.org/10.54605/fec20210403

About ISE | Contact ISE | Links | SUFE-IAR | SUFE
All Rights Reserved:2020 Institute for Advanced Research,
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics.777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai, PRC,200433